July 2009 Archives

Now that Wall Street is drinking the kool aid of recovery and dreaming of glory times past, Main Street and Joe American would be wise to avoid the party. Yes, the worst of the recession is probably behind us, but that doesn't mean we're on the fast track back to where we were economically.

The US has collectively lost $13 trillion of wealth in the last two years, but much of that wealth was created on artificially cheap capital. If capital and risk had been priced properly, without the government artificially setting the interest rates too low (thanks Greenspan!) and the over leveraged speculators manipulating prices, the economic bubble would not have occurred. 

Without the bubble, real estate would have followed long-term trends and grown in value somewhere between 2%-5% per year. According to some respectable and mostly reliable economists, it may take at least 10 to 15 years for housing in some markets to reach the prices seen a few years ago, which coincidentally enough, is right in line with the traditional growth rate.

The economic hangover we've collectively felt the last two years is from several years of drinking too much cheap capital, leading us to believe our economy is stronger and better looking than it actually is. So what does this mean? It means, unless we get drunk again on another cheap bottle of capital and over leverage ourselves, economic growth is going to closely match the rate of inflation plus population growth (the historical growth rate since 1945).

What we've been experiencing is a correction (i.e. sobering up) to normal valuations/prices based on historical trends. Therefore a recovery will only be a return to growth in the economy of an annual rate of somewhere between 2% and 4%, not a quick return to the drunken, overvalued days of a few years ago.

What has America learned from this debacle and the tech one before it? Unfortunately, probably not enough, but hopefully we can recognize when we're getting drunk a little earlier next time and stop drinking before we go home with the ugly person at the end of the bar (economically speaking that is).

A full recovery to the prices and valuation peaks from 2007 will take some time, which should be preferred by everyone, because a fast recovery will be just another bubble waiting to burst. We're a mature capitalistic economy that should expect growth at rather conservative rates. So kick back a little, grow moderately, and enjoy life without the worry of an economic  hangover.
It seems every week there is a new acronym for a group of nations cooperating economically--from the G7 or is that G8, and the G20 to ASEAN, APEC, CAFTA and CONCACAF, not to mention NAFTA and the EU. While most of these groupings are logical from a geographic, political, or economic synergy sense, another national grouping getting significant press is the BRIC, which makes no sense.

The BRIC is comprised of Brazil, Russia, India, and China--the so called major developing nations. They are a significant grouping of countries, which combined account for more than 40% of world's population and about one quarter of the world's land. On the surface, this grouping makes sense, but deeper inspection shows the group to look like a picture of three young athletes with one old, fat guy.

While most national alliances are put together by the county's themselves, the BRIC group and acronym was created by Jim O'Neill at the investment bank Goldman Sachs. The grouping came about based on his thesis that these countries would become among the four most dominant economies by the year 2050. That being said, the four countries seem to have embraced the union, though the real purpose and goal of the union has yet to be defined. Based on their media statements so far, their only goal so far is to try to dethrone the dollar as the world's reserve currency.

There are a of couple serious flaws with O'Neill thesis. First, for the BRIC to become the largest economies in the world by 2050, we have to assume all four countries will continue to grow at historic rates. As any capitalist can tell you, market economies are going to have up and down economic cycles, and as the recent global recession reminds us, the faster the growth, generally the harder the recession from a bubble bursting. Additionally, all of the BRIC nations have serious political and social hurdles to deal with on their way to becoming long-term economic powerhouses. 

Besides the aforementioned issues, my real issue with this grouping is Russia. While Brazil, India, and China (BIC) are all fast growing economies with extensive potential based on young and/or growing populations among other factors, Russia is not. Russia's population is aging fast and expected to decline by 20% by 2050. This contrasts with the young and growing/stable populations of Brazil, India, and China. These three countries also have governments and cultures that are evolving towards free market economies, albeit slowly. Russia's government is moving in reverse away from a free market.

Russia, post Soviet era, is only in the economic major league because of its oil and natural gas resources. While these are valuable economic resources, by 2050 oil and natural gas production in Russia is projected to be less than 20% its current levels. This fact plus a drastically smaller, older population, not to mention the political issues, means Russia is not much more than a large Saudi Arabia economically. Ok, maybe long-term Russia has a little more to offer economically than an Arab nation, but it doesn't offer anything near what Brazil, India, and China bring to the table.

While Brazil, India, and China deserve a seat at the world economic table influencing the future of the global economy, Russia does not. It's like have an aging, stubborn, bitter board member who doesn't want to let go. It's time we let the BRIC go away into media purgatory and focus on real economic alliances that can make the global economy stronger.

About this Archive

This page is an archive of entries from July 2009 listed from newest to oldest.

June 2009 is the previous archive.

August 2009 is the next archive.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

Pages

Powered by Movable Type 4.35-en